THE TENSION: Ruling Allows Navy Sonar Use

PACIFIC OCEAN (Aug. 11, 2007) - Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer USS Halsey (DDG 97) conducts a fueling at sea (FAS) alongside Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72). Lincoln and embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 2 are underway off the coast of Southern California conducting a Tailored Ship's Training Availability (TSTA). U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Apprentice Chantell J. Wilson (RELEASED)

News in Balance:

Recently, a number of news outlets reported that a federal court issued an injunction on Monday blocking the Navy from using a type of sonar that wildlife supporters say harms whales in exercises off the California coast.

Reuters, a news outlet not known for complete objectivity, proclaimed:

The preliminary injunction is a victory for environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, or NRDC, which filed a lawsuit in March claiming the Navy did not do sufficient environmental testing of its mid-frequency active sonar.

What Reuters and AP have yet to report is that the National Marine Fisheries Services issued a final ruling on Thursday that allows the Navy to continue operating sonar in the western Pacific Ocean for the next five years, subject to a yearly authorization renewal.

Ruling Allows Navy to Continue Using Low-Frequency Sonar
8/17/2007
By Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Brandan W. Schulze, Navy Office of Information

WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The National Marine Fisheries Services issued a final rule Aug. 16 that allows the Navy to continue operating Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System Low Frequency Active (SURTASS LFA) sonar in the western Pacific Ocean for the next five years, subject to a yearly authorization renewal.

SURTASS LFA consists of two separate components. The LFA portion of the system is suspended vertically below the ship and transmits low-frequency sound energy into the water. SURTASS, the passive portion of the system, is towed behind the ship and is made up of a series of underwater microphones that detect natural and man-made sound energy in the water. This allows underwater objects, such as submarines, to be detected.

"SURTASS LFA gives us a solid capability that has been proven at sea," said Rear Adm. Carl V. Mauney, Director, Submarine Warfare. "It allows us to detect and track diesel-electric submarines at long range, enabling action, if necessary, at a time and place of our choosing."

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Environment) Donald R. Schregardus says the ruling "will allow the Navy to continue operations in the western Pacific that are vital to our national defense."

According to Schregardus, the system is vital for use in tracking extremely quiet diesel-electric submarines, which could pose a potential threat to Navy Sailors and ships if they go undetected.

When operating on battery power, these submarines can conduct nearly silent underwater operations. As countries continue to acquire diesel-electric submarines, the Navy makes tracking them a priority.

"SURTASS LFA sonar is the single best system the Navy has to find and track such submarines at long distances. This system helps keep our service members, our ships and our national interests safe," said Schregardus.

He said SURTASS LFA is necessary for national security, and is operated in a manner that is environmentally sound. Past research has facilitated the development of science-based mitigation measures that allow the sonar to operate in harmony with the ocean environment. Sonar operators monitor for the presence of marine mammals prior to, during and after sonar activity and either turn off or delay start-up if marine mammals come too close.

Schregardus said that five years of these sonar operations in the western Pacific produced no evidence of any harm to marine mammals or their populations.

"The Navy's extensive operations experience with this system, in combination with thorough scientific studies on the system's effects on marine mammals and fish, confirms that this sonar can coexist with ocean life," said Schregardus.

Schregardus said claims that SURTASS LFA destroys ocean life and cannot be operated in harmony with the environment are "simply untrue and not supported by scientific fact."